We publish the record and the receipts. NuSy's ideas live in a public preprint trail going back to 2025, and every quantitative claim we make in public resolves to an on-disk evaluation you can check. Below: the program, and — because our engine is now closed — exactly how you verify us anyway.


The program

Our research is a continuous, dated public record — timestamped preprints on Zenodo, not a retrospective story.

All papers → — every preprint with its DOI, its headline result, and, where one exists, a plain-English explainer of what it found and what it does not claim.

The arc runs from the early cognitive-architecture work to the current V20 program (a governed, proof-carrying reasoning runtime — the Noesis being).

Foundations (2025 → early 2026). The cognitive architecture and its substrate:

Certification & the cross-domain yardstick (2026). The AGI Certification Framework (ACF) (#122) — a graph-based framework for measuring general capability across dimensions. ACF is open (below).

The current program (V20). The active direction: a governed reasoning runtime — four planes over governed state, an authority axis over memory (Candidate < Evidence < VerifiedProof), and refusal as a first-class outcome. The near-term papers (the "Graph Governance" position paper and the causal-reasoning-behind-a-proof-gate work) are in preparation; we publish them when the evidence is on disk, not when a trend peaks.

Every claim wears a label. Across this site we mark each claim Proven (measured at a stated scope, regenerable from a test), Nascent (real but early or narrow — growing, never "comprehensive"), or Demo (a showcase, not a deployed integration). The preprint record above is the published, timestamped trail; our claims ledger is the internal gate that decides which numbers reach a page at all — it is the discipline behind what we say, not a place to look numbers up. The reader-facing route to checking us is How to Verify an AI's Claims.


How you verify us — even though the engine is closed

We went maximum-closed: the reasoning core, the never-launder gate, and the proof engine are commercial IP. That changes how you check us — from "read the code" to "check the receipts" — but not whether you can. Verification here is not a slogan; it's a set of things you can actually take us up on today.

The point of maximum-closed done honestly: a company that publishes the ruler it measures itself with, and hands you the receipts on request, is one you can check without reading its source.


Open, and installable today

Not everything is closed. What's open is genuinely open — installable, cited, licensed:

(Our earlier engine mirrors were archived when we went closed — we say so plainly on the open-source page rather than leave stale "install this" instructions pointing at retired code.)


Verification, not trust. The preprint trail is the public record; our internal claims ledger gates every number to its evidence before it ships; the open specs let you check the method itself. As of 2026-08-17. Every figure we publish traces to an on-disk evaluation (our guardrail: no number ships that doesn't).